Category | Excellent | Good | Needs work |
---|---|---|---|
Organization & Formatting |
5 All formatting guidelines are followed; YAML is correct with all team members listed; Rmd compiles to html. |
4 Most formatting guidelines are followed; YAML is correct with all team members listed; Rmd might require one fix to compile to html. |
3 Several or all formatting guidelines not followed; YAML contains elements that arenโt updated from the template; Rmd requires mutliple fixes to compile to html. |
Target Population |
10 / 9 Target population clearly identified; fielding strategy is discussed; eligibility requirement question text is specified. |
8 / 7 / 6 Target population identified, though may need to be refined; fielding strategy is discussed; eligibility requirement question text needs to be refined. |
5 / 4 / 3 Target population unclear; fielding strategy missing; eligibility requirement question text needs to be refined or is missing. |
Conjoint Questions |
10 / 9 Exact conjoint question text is clear and specific; table of all attributes are included. |
8 / 7 / 6 Conjoint question text could be improved; table of all attributes are included with some attributes missing. |
5 / 4 / 3 Conjoint question text is missing or poorly written / unclear; table of all attributes is missing or unclear. |
Other Content |
10 / 9 All required survey components are specified with clear, precise question text included. |
8 / 7 / 6 Some but not all required survey components are specified. |
5 / 4 / 3 Missing multiple of the required survey components, question text is unclear. |