class: middle, inverse .leftcol30[ <center> <img src="https://madd.seas.gwu.edu/images/logo.png" width=250> </center> ] .rightcol70[ # Week 12: .fancy[Heterogeneity] ###
EMSE 6035: Marketing Analytics for Design Decisions ###
John Paul Helveston ###
November 13, 2024 ] --- class: inverse # Quiz 5 - last one!
−
+
10
:
00
.leftcol[ ### Download the template from the #class channel ### Make sure you unzip it! ### When done, submit your `quiz5.qmd` on Blackboard ] .rightcol[ <center> <img src="https://github.com/emse-p4a-gwu/2022-Spring/raw/main/images/quiz_doge.png" width="400"> </center> ] --- # Houskeeping items - **Final presentations** will be on 12/11 during normal class hours. You can pre-record a video presentation if you want, or you can do it live. -- - [**Final Analysis**](https://madd.seas.gwu.edu/2024-Fall/project/6-final-analysis.html) (due 12/08) will also be an html page report. -- - I am planning on posting all final analyses (without grades) to the course site as a showcase for future students - **please DM me if you would NOT like your report posted**. ([examples](https://madd.seas.gwu.edu/showcase) from last year) --- class: inverse, middle # Week 12: .fancy[Heterogeneity] ### 1. Mixed logit (unobserved heterogeneity) ### 2. Sub-group modeling (observed heterogeneity) --- class: inverse, middle # Week 12: .fancy[Heterogeneity] ### 1. .orange[Mixed logit (unobserved heterogeneity)] ### 2. Sub-group modeling (observed heterogeneity) --- background-color: #EEEDEE class: center # Two ways of modeling heterogeneity .leftcol[ .red["Observed Heterogeneity"] ] .rightcol[ .red["Unobserved Heterogeneity"] ] <center> <img src="images/heterogeneity.png" width=1000> </center> --- background-color: #EEEDEE ## .center[Mixed logit] ### Preference parameters follow a distribution<br>**across sample population** .leftcol[ <center> <img src="images/mixed_par.png" width=500> </center> ] .rightcol[ ## `$$\tilde{u}_j = \beta_1 x_j + \varepsilon_j$$` ## `$$\beta_1 \sim \mathrm{N} (\mu_1, \sigma_1)$$` Parameter | Estimate | Standard Error ----------|----------|----------------- `\(\mu_1\)` | 0.1 | 0.01 `\(\sigma_1\)` | 0.1 | 0.01 ] --- ## Which distribution should I use? .cols3[ **Normal distribution** When preferences can be positive or negative e.g. `brand = "n"` <img src="figs/unnamed-chunk-4-1.png" width="522.144" /> ] -- .cols3[ **Log-normal distribution** When preferences should be strictly positive e.g. `-1*price = "ln"` <img src="figs/unnamed-chunk-5-1.png" width="522.144" /> ] -- .cols3[ **Fixed parameter** When preferences appear to be homogeneous (e.g. `\(\sigma\)` is very small) <img src="figs/unnamed-chunk-6-1.png" width="522.144" /> ] --- class: center ### Mixed logits are not equivalent in Preference vs. WTP space .leftcol[ ### Preference space ### `$$\tilde{u}_j = \alpha p_j + \beta x_j + \varepsilon_j$$` ### `$$\alpha \sim \ln\mathrm{N} (\mu_1, \sigma_1)$$` ### `$$\beta \sim \mathrm{N} (\mu_2, \sigma_2)$$` ] --- class: center ### Mixed logits are not equivalent in Preference vs. WTP space .leftcol[ ### Preference space ### `$$\tilde{u}_j = \alpha p_j + \beta x_j + \varepsilon_j$$` ### `$$\alpha \sim \ln\mathrm{N} (\mu_1, \sigma_1)$$` ### `$$\beta \sim \mathrm{N} (\mu_2, \sigma_2)$$` ### `$$\omega = \frac{\beta}{-\alpha} = \frac{\mathrm{N} (\mu_2, \sigma_2)}{- \ln\mathrm{N} (\mu_1, \sigma_1)}$$` ] -- .rightcol[ ### WTP space ### `$$\tilde{u}_j = \lambda(\omega_1 x_j - p_j) + \varepsilon_j$$` ### `$$\omega_1 \sim \mathrm{N} (\mu_1, \sigma_1)$$` ] --- class: inverse # Practice Question 3 a) Use the `logitr` package to estimate the following homogeneous model: $$ \tilde{u}_j = \beta_1 x_j^{\mathrm{price}} + \beta_2 \delta_j^{\mathrm{feat}} + \beta_3 \delta_j^{\mathrm{dannon}} + \beta_4 \delta_j^{\mathrm{hiland}} + \beta_5 \delta_j^{\mathrm{weight}} + \varepsilon_j $$ where the three `\(\delta\)` coefficients are dummy variables for Dannon, Hiland, and Weight Watchers brands (Yoplait is the reference level). b) Use the `logitr` package to estimate the same model but with the following mixing distributions: - `\(\beta_1 \sim \mathrm{N} (\mu_1, \sigma_1)\)` - `\(\beta_2 \sim \mathrm{N} (\mu_2, \sigma_2)\)` --- # .center[Estimating mixed logit models with `logitr`] <br> .rightcol80[ ## 1. Open `logitr-cars` ## 2. Open `code/8.1-model-mxl.R` ] --- class: inverse
−
+
10
:
00
## Your Turn .leftcol80[.font120[ As a team, re-estimate the main model you used in your pilot analysis report, but now using a mixed logit model. Carefully consider which distributions to use (i.e., normal or log-normal) for different variables. ]] --- class: inverse, middle # Week 12: .fancy[Heterogeneity] ### 1. Mixed logit (unobserved heterogeneity) ### 2. .orange[Sub-group modeling (observed heterogeneity)] --- class: center # Two ways of modeling heterogeneity .leftcol[ .red["Observed Heterogeneity"] ] .rightcol[ .red["Unobserved Heterogeneity"] ] <center> <img src="images/heterogeneity.png" width=1000> </center> --- class: middle ### .center[Use interactions to model preferences for multiple groups] .leftcol[ ### Homogenous model: ### `\(\tilde{u}_j = \beta_1 x_j + \varepsilon_j\)` ### Two groups: A & B ### `\(\tilde{u}_j = \beta_1 x_j + \beta_2 x_j \delta^\mathrm{B} + \varepsilon_j\)` ### `\(\quad = (\beta_1 + \beta_2 \delta^\mathrm{B}) x_j + \varepsilon_j\)` ] .rightcol[ Par.| Meaning ----|-------- `\(\beta_1\)` | Effect of `\(x_j\)` for group A `\(\beta_2\)` | _Difference_ in effect of `\(x_j\)` between groups ] --- class: center # What's the difference? .leftcol[ ## Separate models
$$ \tilde{u}_j^\mathrm{A} = \beta_1^\mathrm{A} x_j + \varepsilon_j^\mathrm{A} $$ $$ \tilde{u}_j^\mathrm{B} = \beta_1^\mathrm{B} x_j + \varepsilon_j^\mathrm{B} $$ ] .rightcol[ ## Single model
`$$\tilde{u}_j = \beta_1 x_j + \beta_2 x_j \delta^\mathrm{B} + \varepsilon_j$$` ] --- # .center[Accounting for scale differences] .leftcol[ ## .center[Separate models
] $$ \tilde{u}_j^\mathrm{A} = \alpha^\mathrm{A} p_j + \beta_1^\mathrm{A} x_j + \varepsilon_j^\mathrm{A} $$ $$ \tilde{u}_j^\mathrm{B} = \alpha^\mathrm{B} p_j + \beta_1^\mathrm{B} x_j + \varepsilon_j^\mathrm{B} $$ Imagine you got the following results - `\(\hat{\alpha}^\mathrm{A}\)` = 100 - `\(\hat{\beta}^\mathrm{A}\)` = 200 - `\(\hat{\alpha}^\mathrm{B}\)` = 1 - `\(\hat{\beta}^\mathrm{B}\)` = 2 ] -- .rightcol[ ## .center[Single model
] `$$\tilde{u}_j = \alpha_1 p_j + \alpha_2 p_j \delta^\mathrm{B} + \beta_1 x_j + \beta_2 x_j \delta^\mathrm{B} + \varepsilon_j$$` `$$\quad = (\alpha_1 + \alpha_2 \delta^\mathrm{B}) p_j + (\beta_1 + \beta_2 \delta^\mathrm{B}) x_j + \varepsilon_j$$` ] --- # .center[Accounting for scale differences] .leftcol[ ## .center[Preference Space
] $$ \tilde{u}_j^\mathrm{A} = \alpha^\mathrm{A} p_j + \beta_1^\mathrm{A} x_j + \varepsilon_j^\mathrm{A} $$ $$ \tilde{u}_j^\mathrm{B} = \alpha^\mathrm{B} p_j + \beta_1^\mathrm{B} x_j + \varepsilon_j^\mathrm{B} $$ Imagine you got the following results - `\(\hat{\alpha}^\mathrm{A}\)` = 100 - `\(\hat{\beta}^\mathrm{A}\)` = 200 - `\(\hat{\alpha}^\mathrm{B}\)` = 1 - `\(\hat{\beta}^\mathrm{B}\)` = 2 ] -- .rightcol[ ## .center[WTP Space
] $$ \tilde{u}_j^\mathrm{A} = \lambda^\mathrm{A}(\omega_1^\mathrm{A} x_j - p) + \varepsilon_j^\mathrm{A} $$ $$ \tilde{u}_j^\mathrm{B} = \lambda^\mathrm{B}(\omega_1^\mathrm{B} x_j - p) + \varepsilon_j^\mathrm{B} $$ $$ \omega = \frac{\beta}{- \alpha} $$ - `\(\hat{\omega}^\mathrm{A} = 200 / (-100) = -2\)` - `\(\hat{\omega}^\mathrm{B} = 2 / (-1) = -2\)` ] --- class: inverse # Practice Question 1 Suppose we estimate the following utility model describing preferences for cars: $$ \tilde{u}_j = \beta_1 x_j^{\mathrm{price}} + \beta_2 x_j^{\mathrm{mpg}} + \beta_3 x_j^{\mathrm{elec}} + \varepsilon_j $$ a) Using interactions, write out a model that accounts for differences in the effects of `\(x_j^{\mathrm{price}}\)`, `\(x_j^{\mathrm{mpg}}\)`, and `\(x_j^{\mathrm{elec}}\)` between two groups: A and B. b) Write out the effects of `\(x_j^{\mathrm{price}}\)`, `\(x_j^{\mathrm{mpg}}\)`, and `\(x_j^{\mathrm{elec}}\)` for each group. --- class: inverse # Practice Question 2 Suppose we estimate the following utility model describing preferences for chocolate bars between two groups: A & B $$ \tilde{u}_j = \beta_1 x_j^{\mathrm{price}} + \beta_2 x_j^{\mathrm{caco}} + \beta_3 x_j^{\mathrm{price}}\delta_j^{\mathrm{B}} + \beta_4 x_j^{\mathrm{cacao}}\delta_j^{\mathrm{B}} + \varepsilon_j $$ .leftcol55[ The estimated model produces the following coefficients and hessian: `\(\beta\)` = [-0.7, 0.1, 0.2, 0.8] $$ H = `\begin{bmatrix} -6000 & 50 & 60 & 70 \\ 50 & -700 & 50 & 100 \\ 60 & 50 & -300 & 20 \\ 70 & 100 & 20 & -6000 \end{bmatrix}` $$ ] .rightcol45[ a) Use the `mvrnorm()` function from the `MASS` library to generate 10,000 draws of the model coefficients. b) Use the draws to compute the mean WTP and 95% confidence intervals of the effects of `\(x_j^{\mathrm{price}}\)` and `\(x_j^{\mathrm{cacao}}\)` for each group (A & B). ] --- # .center[Estimating mixed logit models with `logitr`] <br> ## 1. Open `logitr-cars` ## 2. Open `code/8.2-model-mnl-groups.R` --- class: inverse
−
+
20
:
00
## Your Turn ### Do this individually, and compare with your teammates: .leftcol80[.font120[ - Examine the demographic and other variables in your pilot data and specify a model that estimates differences between different groups. - Write code to estimate that model (or multiple models, e.g. WTP space models). - Compute and compare WTP across the different groups. ]]