Leaf blowers are essential gardening tools that blow leaves and other contaminating materials. Our goal through this survey was to compute consumers’ preferences for “green” Leaf blowers instead of gas leaf blowers. Green leaf blowers are corded electric (plug-in) and cordless electric (battery-powered), hence leaf blowers that don’t produce greenhouse gas emissions. We were also interested in seeing how: weight,airspeed,run time and leaf blower shape affect consumers’ preferences. Our findings were concluded from 155 respondents’ feedback. We found that consumers’ preferred green leaf blowers, as battery leaf blowers scored highest at our utility model,coming next were runtime then airspeed. Our consumers’ did not prefer high weight,price,and handheld leaf blowers respectively.
Leaf blowers, commonly known as blowers, are gardening tools that blow air through a nozzle for cleaning yards from leaves, grass cuttings, dirt, and sometimes even snow. They come in different sizes and shapes depending on the work volume. Mainly the mechanics of these tools: air is blown through powered engines with different air-power and airspeed depending on workload. Some blowers work as vacuums that suck leaves and grass cuttings through a tube and then shred them into small pieces that are kept in a bag. Through this project, we will only focus on air blowers. Leaf blowers vary in size, shape, power type, and design. In this project, we will classify them based on how they are powered by gas leaf blowers and green leaf blowers (corded electric and cordless electric -battery-powered-leaf blowers).
We are especially interested to know our consumer’s preferences concerning green blowers; that is why power type is a major player in deciding all other specifications and was given special attention. For other attributes, we focused on price, weight, shape, runtime, and airspeed as our primary analysis attributes. We chose these attributes because they were repeatedly mentioned in consumers’ feedback comments on top leaf blowers selling websites.[1]
Below are the levels of the attributes:
Attributes | Continuous/Discrete | Value/Range |
---|---|---|
Power Type | Discrete | Gas, battery, plugin |
Price | Continuous | 40 - 275 USD |
Shape | Discrete | Handheld, Backpack |
Weight | Continuous | 4 - 40 lbs |
Runtime | Continuous | 8 - 1000 mins |
airspeed | Continuous | 50-270 MPH |
Our eligible population was chosen based of: - People who answered “yes” to our consent age question - People who answered “yes” to our consent understand the question - People who answered “yes” to owning a leaf blower now, in the past or interested in buying a leaf blower in the future. We wanted to filter through and get to people interested in buying a leaf blower. The survey is designed to dig in depth into consumer preferences when buying a leaf blower, though anyone with no interest would not ideally engage with our survey.
Along with our choice question, which will be demonstrated in other parts of this report, we were interested in obtaining the following information: - What do our consumers think about banning leaf blowers.
With rising concerns about pollution, noise or others. This question was attempted to weigh our consumers’ general motion on leaf blowers; we found that 41.9% preferred banning gas leaf blowers, which is a high percentage.
We have demonstrated clearly for our respondents what we mean with each attribute:
Additionally we have used the below icons to indicate powertype.
Initially, we were considering noise, air volume, and pollution. Still, we took them out as they were to skew respondents’ choices towards gas or electric leaf blowers, knowing that noise and pollution are highly associated with gas leaf blowers. We eliminated the air volume attribute, which can be correlated to airspeed. We have kept airspeed which is easier to understand. We had to narrow our weight and price levels to a range that is not very wide to push consumers to think through proximate options and pick the best one; this approach would be more reflective. Through designing our survey, we encountered an issue catering to the unlimited runtime coupled with a plug-in leaf blower; unfortunately, the model can only work for purely numeric values in level choices. Or, otherwise, strictly categorical variables (we can have them replaced with dummy variables), but in our case, the unlimited runtime was an unaccounted combination of an attribute that consisted of both numeric and categorical level values that halted the model. Eventually, we decided to cater to this fact by replacing~ unlimited ~with a zero in our model calculations. We carefully examined classmates’ feedback and decreased the level of weight to only two values as opposed to previously, where we had three; one of them being unreasonably too heavy. We have also eliminated a question about whether a consumer had a leaf blower in the past and why they don’t have it now; we thought it could be a large pool of reasons to the point where maybe we wouldn’t be able to extract insight from it.
Our initial population consisted of 417 respondents’ feedback. After filtering consent and eligibility criteria, our sample dropped to 236; finally, we only kept respondents’ who completed our survey in a reasonable time (to filter inattentive and too fast responses). The highest age group was (30-40) marking 34.2% of our sample, followed by (40-50) with 25.16% followed by (18-30) with 21.9% followed by (60-70) with 10.3%. For gender, however, we have had 66 males and 84 females.
The utility model we estimated for our product contains four continuous variables - price, weight, airspeed, and runtime; and two discrete variables - power and shape, which have values of gas, battery, plug-in, and handheld and backpack, respectively.
\[ u_j = \beta_1 x_j^{price} + \beta_2 x_j^{weight} + \beta_3 x_j^{airspeed}+ \beta_4 x_j^{runtime} + \beta_5 \delta_j^{PowerGas} + \beta_6 \delta_j^{PowerBattery}+ \beta_7 \delta_j^{ShapeHandheld} + \varepsilon_j \]
Attributes | Estimate | Std. Error |
---|---|---|
price | -0.00616587 | 0.00053525 |
weight | -0.05423541 | 0.00663762 |
airspeed | 0.00394858 | 0.00043332 |
runtime | 0.00457275 | 0.00072330 |
shape_handehld | -0.07128652 | 0.07884164 |
power_gas | -0.65827450 | 0.12419395 |
power_battery | 0.58479280 | 0.11612488 |
The uncertainty plots show that model coefficients are tightly estimated for most coefficients (minor std. errors). Price has a negative effect but is almost unnoticeable because it is minimal compared to the weight, which is more disliked. Airspeed and runtime are both likable, and people prefer battery leaf blowers that are positive as opposed to gas leaf blowers.
Below we have computed the willingness to pay per each attribute as an extra layer of attributes validation.
This figure shows the willingness to pay, an abstract concept that illustrates to what extent our consumers (“willing to pay on a product”-hence maximum price) measured for a particular attribute.
From this figure,It’s very hard to tell as consumers’ willingness to pay is centered around the mean but the winning motion would be that as weight increases price is likely to increase too. This is a counter intuitive result, but it could be because heavier leaf blowers have collectively better other attributes. Or it could be simply because we have had two levels of weight, whereas the heaviest wasn’t at all heavy~20lbs. Consumers’ willingness to pay for airspeed is almost centered to the mean too but skewed towards less price for having lesser airspeed. This can be associated with battery leaf blowers which were consumers’ top choice. Gas willingness to pay scored low; looking at the power type, we would notice less willingness to pay for gas-leaf blowers and, oppositely, higher for battery. Plug -in is centered because it was our reference level.
Blower | MarketShare | Ranking |
---|---|---|
Blower 1 | 19.6% | Fourth |
Blower 2 | 18.6% | Least-favorite |
Blower 3 | 21.08% | First |
Blower 4 | 20.2% | Third |
Blower 5 | 20.95% | Second |
In this experiment, we devised different alternatives to tightly weigh consumers’ preferences for blowers based on each attribute. The percentages are not very dispersed because the levels are tightly controlled. The main takeaway is people avoid possible gas leaf blowers. Although we placed the lowest price on gas leaf blowers, our consumers’ would still rank it as their least favorite. Blower3, Although not the best price, consumers chose it as their favorite option for probably the high runtime, battery-powered and medium weight. We can see that consumers overlooked shape and went for handheld, which was primarily negative in utility. This gives us high confidence that consumers care for power type, runtime, and weight as their significant purchase drivers. Overall below figure shows very relative probabilities.
Our findings showed that consumers’ preferred green leaf blowers over gas leaf blowers. Our model coefficient estimates showed -0.00616587 for price utility coefficient, which is a very small in comparison to other coefficients. Indicating that leaf blowers is a price insensitive market. Now our results did show that but we are very conservative making this statement for other possible reasons which may have drove us to this result listing some of them is that:The sample size which we conducted our analysis on after the filtering consisted of 155 rows which is small. Additionally, the educational information that we provided about power type at the beginning of our survey might have caused a testing confound where respondents “tried to score right” based on the information they received at the beginning making them focus on power type more than price. For future surveys ; more neutral tone should be used in designing the questions and perhaps mix the order of questions before and after the educational material information to mitigate this possible confound.
A great limitation to our survey was mentioned in the changes to the survey section. We couldn’t computationally capture the runtime~unlimited attribute associated with the plug-in leaf blowers. We have replaced it with a zero but is this really producing the right utility model or could it be biased in a way.
Thank you for participating in this survey, which is part of a research effort by The George Washing University. For this survey, we will ask you about your preferences for different types of leafblowers.
This survey is being conducted by students at The George Washing University. We will not be collecting any identifying data, such as your name or address. The whole survey will take approximately 10 to 15 minutes to complete. Your participation is voluntary and you may stop the survey at any time.
If you would like to participate, please answer the following questions:
I am age 18 or older
I have read and understand the above information
Thank you for consenting your participation for our survey! Now, can you help us know :Have you owned a leaf blower Or Are you interested in buying a leaf blower in the future?
Now that you’ve shared a bit about yourself, we’d like you to consider a shopping scenario in which you can purchase from a set of leaf blowers with different attributes.
Let’s learn about these attributes:
refers to the price to buy this leaf blower measured in US$.
refers to the actual weight of leaf blowers that furthermore depends upon the type of engine used to build the whole product measured in lbs.
is the time that leaf blowers are operational after charging measured in mins. - unlimited ~ is the associated option for plug-ins leaf blowers.
refers to the force that blows out to move leaves and debris. Measured in MPH.
We’ll now begin the choice tasks. On the next few pages we will show you three options of leaf blowers and we’ll ask you to choose the one you most prefer.
For example, if these were the only leaf blowers available, which would you choose?
Through those questions you will see these icons for power-type; here is what we mean by them.
Option 1
power-type: battery
Option 2
power-type: Gas
Option 3
power-type: plug-in
We will now show you 8 sets of choice questions starting on the next page.
[mc_button type question with the following three options]
(1 of 8) If these were your only options, which would you choose?
Option 1
power: gas shape: backback price: $ 80 weight: 20 lb runtime: 60 mins airspeed: 125 MPH
Option 2
power: gas shape: backback price: $ 200 weight: 8 lb runtime: 60 mins airspeed: 270 MPH
Option 3
power: battery shape: handheld price: $ 275 weight: 8 lb runtime: 100 mins airspeed: 50 MPH
Thank you for your feedback! The next section will ask some basic questions about leaf blowers.Please answer to the best of your knowledge.
Gas powered leaf blowers can be polluting and noisy and have a handful of health problems.
You have been Great!
Did you know that some electric leaf blowers can perform the same tasks as gas-powered leaf blowers without the use of fossil fuel?!
We’re almost done! We’d just like to ask just a few more questions about you which we will only use for analyzing our survey data.
(Drop down menu including Prefer not to say
and years
1920
- 2003
)
Please let us know if you have any other thoughts or feedback on this survey.
Your feedback will help us make future improvements :)
(Open text response)
Finish
Survey Link: Leaf blowers Live Survey Link [https://leafblowers.formr.org/]
A special thank you is extended to Dr. John Paul Helveston for his support throughout this research project.
Comments